He was replaced as interim CEO by Chelsea Turner, who had been hired originally by Noble as the lottery’s chief of strategy and government and operational affairs, and it was in that interim CEO’s role that Turner placed DuPuis on leave in February after the internal investigation.ĭuPuis said in the complaint that both Noble and Turner, “who is Noble’s longtime protege, personal friend and coworker ,” had talked against him, according to Farricker. She entered a lucrative separation agreement that kept her on the lottery’s payroll until 2017 and enabled her to qualify for state retirement benefits.įarricker filled in as interim CEO until May 2017, when he resigned after first attempting to become permanent CEO. Noble stepped down as CEO in September 2016 amid the consumer protection agency’s investigation of 5 Card Cash, but didn’t attribute her decision to the probe. he was certain the ‘gross neglect’ charge against me was in retaliation for my uncovering the fraud scheme in the 5 Card Cash game” - as well as “the reporting of it to the Department of Consumer Protection … which resulted in the resignation of Anne Noble as the president & CEO.” 22, the lottery’s former board chairman/interim CEO, Frank Farricker, contacted him and “felt compelled to tell me. He said that he’d already advised Noble in April 2015 that the game “had a great potential for retailer fraud and suggested fraud mitigation actions to deter or prevent it” that Noble “declined to consider.” DuPuis to conduct all of these post-January 1 … drawing activities undermines its claim of gross neglect.” ‘Potential’ For FraudĭuPuis said in his CHRO complaint that “to provide a historical background as to my belief of retaliation, I told that in January 2016, I had advised the then President & CEO, Anne Noble, of my knowledge of the potential fraud” in the 5 Card Cash game. The auditors made a similar point in their report Friday, saying: “The fact that CLC relied upon Mr. 16 do-over drawing to DuPuis, and it “can’t have it both ways” - that is, claiming he was negligent while still trusting him to “fix the problem” by overseeing the second drawing. Verrengia said the lottery corporation entrusted the proper conduct of the Jan. DuPuis and solidifies what many legislators on the committee believed from the outset - that he was unfairly accused of being grossly negligent.” “We were just provided a copy … and will be discussing it” with the agency’s board of directors, said Tara Chozet, the lottery’s director of public relations and social media.īut Verrengia said Friday that the auditors’ report “clearly vindicates Mr. ![]() Lottery officials did not comment Friday on specifics in the report. “The CLC will vigorously defend itself against any allegations to the contrary,” Stone told them. ![]() Lottery officials deny DuPuis’ allegations, the auditors said in their report, adding that Matthew Stone, the lottery’s general counsel, had told them “there has been zero retaliation” by anyone at the lottery against DuPuis. DuPuis was guilty of ‘gross neglect in the execution of his duties’ is warranted and whether CLC retaliated against Mr. The auditors stopped short of making a final finding on DuPuis’ claims, and said the CHRO “is the appropriate independent authority to definitely determine whether the circumstances that resulted in the conclusion that Mr. DuPuis’ issues with CLC leadership began shortly after he pointed out the vulnerabilities in the 5 Card Cash game in January of 2015.” DuPuis began working at CLC in 1997, and had never been disciplined for any reason. The Department of Consumer Protection that the mistakes in the JanuSuper Draw were caused by human error and that the entire team should have caught the error. In addition, when we asked CLC management for any communication or documentation on how they determined the gross neglect standard, they did not produce anything to support the standard. “CLC did not provide a clear explanation of how it arrived at the gross neglect charge. The specific charge of ‘gross neglect’ had never been leveled against any other CLC employee in its history. ![]() On Friday, state auditors John Geragosian and Rob Kane wrote to Verrengia and Fasano, telling them: “Through our review, we concluded that the charge of gross neglect and the associated administrative leave with pay could have resulted from arbitrary or retaliatory motives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |